Takeaways from the “Joint Statement of the Security Consultative Committee."
“In view of the increasingly uncertain security environment in the Asia-Pacific region …
“... the U.S. intent to rebalance defense priorities toward the Asia-Pacific region ...”
“.. support the development of Guam as a strategic hub ...”
“In order to develop Guam as a strategic hub ...”
What this means:
-- The “increasingly uncertain security environment” is a clear reference to China’s naval development. Other than the pirates, there’s not much else going on in this region unless you look afar to Pakistan.
-- The references to Guam as a “strategic hub” is in context to Okinawa's diminishing importance, but also defines Guam's new role.
The New York Times has a forum running that ask: Are We Headed for a Cold War With China?
Among its writers is Zhu Feng, a professor in the School of International Studies and the deputy director of the Center for International and Strategic Studies at Beijing University.
Feng sees the military rebalancing in Asia-Pacific as the creation of military programs "that very specifically target China."
Another is Stephen M. Walt, a professor of international affairs at Harvard University, who sees increased security competition with China but believes economic needs will keep the rivalry within bounds.
Map source: CIA analysis on China's naval capabilities, 1965
No comments:
Post a Comment